IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v12y2020i4p279-297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mothers’ education and the effectiveness of nutrition programmes: evidence from a matched cross-sectional study in rural Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas de Hoop
  • Shelby Fallon
  • Fakir Md Yunus
  • Sabeth Munrat
  • Saira Parveen Jolly
  • Farzana Sehrin
  • Bachera Aktar
  • Ruhina Binta A Ghani
  • Joshua Sennett

Abstract

BRAC Bangladesh trains community health workers to communicate about nutrition in its Maternal, Newborn and Child Health programme. We estimate the programme’s impact on nutrition outcomes among rural Bangladeshi children of two years and younger. We find positive effects on dietary diversity, and show that the programme reduces stunting with 7 percentage points using data from 1600 households in 40 beneficiary mouzas and 40 comparison mouzas. We find larger effects for households where primary caregivers have finished primary school. We did not find effects on wasting, which in contrast to stunting is higher among children with primary caregivers without education.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas de Hoop & Shelby Fallon & Fakir Md Yunus & Sabeth Munrat & Saira Parveen Jolly & Farzana Sehrin & Bachera Aktar & Ruhina Binta A Ghani & Joshua Sennett, 2020. "Mothers’ education and the effectiveness of nutrition programmes: evidence from a matched cross-sectional study in rural Bangladesh," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 279-297, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:279-297
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2020.1828998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2020.1828998
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2020.1828998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:279-297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.