IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevef/v11y2019i1p43-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Target segmentation in WASH policies, programmes and projects: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Akshaya Ayyangar
  • Sriharini Narayanan
  • Reeba Devaraj
  • Venkata Santhosh Kumar
  • Ganesh Devkar
  • Thillai Rajan Annamalai

Abstract

Despite several years of concentrated efforts to provide safe and improved water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) facilities, progress towards universal access to WASH has been uneven. The problem is more acute in developing countries. Identification of target segments and proper understanding of barriers faced by these segments would have an important role to play in achieving universal access to WASH facilities. There are multiple ways of segmenting WASH beneficiaries: The conventional approach has been through geographical and social segmentation (such as urban, rural, poor and so on), however there is increasing advocacy for a life-cycle based approach that targets beneficiaries based on their gender, age and so on. This systematic review compares the trends in Life-Cycle Segmentation (LCS) vis-a-vis the Geographic and Social Segmentation (GSS) with the hypothesis that such an understanding would be helpful in achieving universal access to WASH. Drawing on policies, programmes and projects from 11 countries in Southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, it was found that in general, GSS has been the dominant approach to targeting population in WASH policy making and programming, though there were variations across regions and sectors. Incorporation of LCS would complement the GSS in improving effectiveness and equity of access to WASH interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Akshaya Ayyangar & Sriharini Narayanan & Reeba Devaraj & Venkata Santhosh Kumar & Ganesh Devkar & Thillai Rajan Annamalai, 2019. "Target segmentation in WASH policies, programmes and projects: a systematic review," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 43-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:43-67
    DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2019.1595090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19439342.2019.1595090
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19439342.2019.1595090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevef:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:43-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJDE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.