IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v7y2014i1p79-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commodifying Passion

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Petersson McIntyre

Abstract

What does it mean to love one's job? This article argues that for an understanding of power and agency in the labour market, particularly in the service and retail industry, passion needs to be given more consideration. Building on ethnographic observations and interviews with sales assistants and store managers within fashion retailing, the reasons for employees to perform 'aesthetic labour' are examined. Aesthetic labour generally refers to work practices in which workers are expected to conform to particular corporate aesthetics, management ideals or brand identities. The article argues that embodied work practices must be related to workers' own motivations. The purpose is to examine why so many people working as sales staff in the field of fashion retail claim to 'love' their work and why 'passion' is considered so important? The findings of this work are that employees are driven by emotions and affects and that aesthetic labour relies on 'the commodification of passion'. Workers dressed and talked the way they did because they identified affectively with the self-organizing principles of these retail fields. Passion made sense to the interviewees because it gave meaning to being a working subject on the neo-liberal labour market.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Petersson McIntyre, 2014. "Commodifying Passion," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 79-94, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:79-94
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2013.851029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2013.851029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2013.851029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:79-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.