IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v1y2008i3p263-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting Distinction

Author

Listed:
  • Michèle Ollivier

Abstract

An important challenge to Bourdieu's theory of taste over the past decades has been how to theorize class distinction in contexts where class identities are not particularly salient and where boundaries between high and low culture seem increasingly permeable. Class distinction is sometimes presented as individualized rather than collective, but what is meant by this is not always very clear. Empirical studies of taste often function with a fuzzy concept of class and pay little attention to dimensions of inequality other than class. This paper seeks to remedy these difficulties in two main ways. First, I propose to reframe class analysis to take into account recent developments in theories of social differentiation, social division and symbolic boundaries. Second, I argue that class distinction is embedded in more general conceptions of excellence and the good life. Cultural eclecticism builds on a vision of excellence as simultaneously individual and collective and as innate and achieved. I illustrate the usefulness of this framework by discussing Richard Florida's work on the rise of the creative class.

Suggested Citation

  • Michèle Ollivier, 2008. "Revisiting Distinction," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 263-279, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:1:y:2008:i:3:p:263-279
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350802476970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350802476970
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350802476970?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:1:y:2008:i:3:p:263-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.