IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v42y2015i9p1973-1983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical likelihood ratio-based goodness-of-fit test for the logistic distribution

Author

Listed:
  • Hadi Alizadeh Noughabi

Abstract

The logistic distribution has been used to model growth curves in survival analysis and biological studies. In this article, we propose a goodness-of-fit test for the logistic distribution based on the empirical likelihood ratio. The test is constructed based on the methodology introduced by Vexler and Gurevich [17]. In order to compute the test statistic, parameters of the distribution are estimated by the method of maximum likelihood. Power comparisons of the proposed test with some known competing tests are carried out via simulations. Finally, an illustrative example is presented and analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadi Alizadeh Noughabi, 2015. "Empirical likelihood ratio-based goodness-of-fit test for the logistic distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(9), pages 1973-1983, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:42:y:2015:i:9:p:1973-1983
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1014893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2015.1014893
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2015.1014893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albert Vexler & Young Min Kim & Jihnhee Yu & Nicole A. Lazar & Alan D. Hutson, 2014. "Computing Critical Values of Exact Tests by Incorporating Monte Carlo Simulations Combined with Statistical Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1013-1030, December.
    2. Albert Vexler & Jihnhee Yu & Alan D. Hutson, 2011. "Likelihood testing populations modeled by autoregressive process subject to the limit of detection in applications to longitudinal biomedical data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7), pages 1333-1346, May.
    3. Vexler, Albert & Gurevich, Gregory, 2010. "Empirical likelihood ratios applied to goodness-of-fit tests based on sample entropy," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 531-545, February.
    4. Modarres, Reza & Nayak, Tapan K. & Gastwirth, Joseph L., 2002. "Estimation of upper quantiles under model and parameter uncertainty," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 529-554, June.
    5. Albert Vexler & Shuling Liu & Enrique F. Schisterman, 2011. "Nonparametric-likelihood inference based on cost-effectively-sampled-data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 769-783, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hadi Alizadeh Noughabi, 2022. "A New Goodness-of-Fit Test for the Logistic Distribution," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 303-319, May.
    2. Gerrit Lodewicus Grobler & Elzanie Bothma & James Samuel Allison, 2022. "Testing for the Rayleigh Distribution: A New Test with Comparisons to Tests for Exponentiality Based on Transformed Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadi Alizadeh Noughabi & Albert Vexler, 2016. "An efficient correction to the density-based empirical likelihood ratio goodness-of-fit test for the inverse Gaussian distribution," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(16), pages 2988-3003, December.
    2. Asok K. Nanda & Shovan Chowdhury, 2021. "Shannon's Entropy and Its Generalisations Towards Statistical Inference in Last Seven Decades," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(1), pages 167-185, April.
    3. Pavia, Jose M., 2015. "Testing Goodness-of-Fit with the Kernel Density Estimator: GoFKernel," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 66(c01).
    4. Freeman, Jade & Modarres, Reza, 2006. "Inverse Box-Cox: The power-normal distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(8), pages 764-772, April.
    5. Wei Ning & Grace Ngunkeng, 2013. "An empirical likelihood ratio based goodness-of-fit test for skew normality," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(2), pages 209-226, June.
    6. Albert Vexler & Wan-Min Tsai & Alan D. Hutson, 2014. "A Simple Density-Based Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Independence," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(3), pages 158-169, February.
    7. Bagkavos, Dimitrios & Patil, Prakash N., 2023. "Goodness-of-fit testing for normal mixture densities," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Albert Vexler & Young Min Kim & Jihnhee Yu & Nicole A. Lazar & Alan D. Hutson, 2014. "Computing Critical Values of Exact Tests by Incorporating Monte Carlo Simulations Combined with Statistical Tables," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 41(4), pages 1013-1030, December.
    9. Havva Alizadeh Noughabi, 2016. "Two Powerful Tests for Normality," Annals of Data Science, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 225-234, June.
    10. Vytaras Brazauskas & Sahadeb Upretee, 2019. "Model Efficiency and Uncertainty in Quantile Estimation of Loss Severity Distributions," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Hart, Jeffrey D. & Choi, Taeryon & Yi, Seongbaek, 2016. "Frequentist nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests via marginal likelihood ratios," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 120-132.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:42:y:2015:i:9:p:1973-1983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.