IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/japsta/v40y2013i12p2601-2616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of multiple high leverage points in logistic regression

Author

Listed:
  • A.H.M. Rahmatullah Imon
  • Ali S. Hadi

Abstract

Leverage values are being used in regression diagnostics as measures of unusual observations in the X -space. Detection of high leverage observations or points is crucial due to their responsibility for masking outliers. In linear regression, high leverage points (HLP) are those that stand far apart from the center (mean) of the data and hence the most extreme points in the covariate space get the highest leverage. But Hosemer and Lemeshow [ Applied logistic regression , Wiley, New York, 1980] pointed out that in logistic regression, the leverage measure contains a component which can make the leverage values of genuine HLP misleadingly very small and that creates problem in the correct identification of the cases. Attempts have been made to identify the HLP based on the median distances from the mean, but since they are designed for the identification of a single high leverage point they may not be very effective in the presence of multiple HLP due to their masking (false--negative) and swamping (false--positive) effects. In this paper we propose a new method for the identification of multiple HLP in logistic regression where the suspect cases are identified by a robust group deletion technique and they are confirmed using diagnostic techniques. The usefulness of the proposed method is then investigated through several well-known examples and a Monte Carlo simulation.

Suggested Citation

  • A.H.M. Rahmatullah Imon & Ali S. Hadi, 2013. "Identification of multiple high leverage points in logistic regression," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(12), pages 2601-2616, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:12:p:2601-2616
    DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.822057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02664763.2013.822057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02664763.2013.822057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:japsta:v:40:y:2013:i:12:p:2601-2616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.