IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/irapec/v33y2019i5p697-711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natives, immigrants and social cohesion: intra-city analysis combining the hedonic approach and a framed field experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Riccardo Borgoni
  • Giacomo Degli Antoni
  • Marco Faillo
  • Alessandra Michelangeli

Abstract

The literature on the hedonic price approach applied to housing highlights the existence of natives’ preferences against living in urban areas with high foreign-born population. At the same time, empirical and experimental evidence show that ethnic fragmentation reduces social cohesion in society. Mainly because of the difficulty to measure social cohesion at the neighborhood level, the correlation between these two phenomena is still largely unexplored. In this paper, we investigate natives’ preferences for immigrants following an original approach that combines the hedonic price approach and a framed field experiment. The latter allows us to collect a measure of cooperation at the neighborhood level. We apply this methodology to the city of Milan. Our findings show that natives prefer to not live in dense immigrants neighborhoods. However, this preference is not attributable to an erosion of social cohesion in those areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Riccardo Borgoni & Giacomo Degli Antoni & Marco Faillo & Alessandra Michelangeli, 2019. "Natives, immigrants and social cohesion: intra-city analysis combining the hedonic approach and a framed field experiment," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 697-711, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:33:y:2019:i:5:p:697-711
    DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2018.1518412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02692171.2018.1518412
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02692171.2018.1518412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:irapec:v:33:y:2019:i:5:p:697-711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIRA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.