IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v21y2021i3p361-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Play responsibly’: consumers’ attention to and understanding of warning messages on scratch-off lottery tickets

Author

Listed:
  • Tori L. Horn
  • James P. Whelan
  • Qian Li
  • Abby McPhail
  • Andrew W. Meyers
  • Rimsha Majeed
  • Stephanie Huette

Abstract

To explore whether consumers see and understand warning messages on scratch-off lottery tickets, two laboratory observation studies were conducted. In the first study, 64 undergraduates were randomly assigned to either freely interact with a lottery ticket (i.e. minimal instruction condition) or search for information on the ticket related to gambling risks (i.e. message search condition) and then handed a lottery ticket. Approximately, one third failed to turn to the back of the ticket where warning messages were placed, and few participants accurately identified the messages. In the second study, 47 undergraduates were randomly assigned to either the minimal instruction condition or message search condition. Participants viewed computer images of the front and back of two lottery tickets while eye movement data were recorded. Analyses revealed that participants looked at the messages, but no more than other comparable areas of the tickets regardless of instructional condition. Generally, participants reported that ‘Play Responsibly,’ was easy to understand, but did not ‘teach them anything new.’ Approximately 20% of participants correctly interpreted the overall odds of winning statement. These findings support the need to improve the placement and content of scratchcard warning messages to educate players about the risks associated with lottery play.

Suggested Citation

  • Tori L. Horn & James P. Whelan & Qian Li & Abby McPhail & Andrew W. Meyers & Rimsha Majeed & Stephanie Huette, 2021. "‘Play responsibly’: consumers’ attention to and understanding of warning messages on scratch-off lottery tickets," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 361-380, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:21:y:2021:i:3:p:361-380
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2021.1886313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2021.1886313
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2021.1886313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:21:y:2021:i:3:p:361-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.