IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intgms/v10y2010i2p117-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-generated motives for gambling in two population-based samples of gamblers

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel S. McGrath
  • Sherry H. Stewart
  • Raymond M. Klein
  • Sean P. Barrett

Abstract

In the present study, self-generated responses to a question regarding reasons for gambling from two epidemiological surveys were combined and placed into another earlier motivational model for alcohol use, adapted for gambling. Of the 3601 reasons, 954 could be categorised into the model's categories: (a) coping motives (internal, negative reinforcement); (b) enhancement motives (internal, positive reinforcement); and (c) social motives (external, positive reinforcement). Results indicate that coping gamblers experienced greater gambling severity and psychopathology, enhancement gamblers were most likely to gamble while intoxicated and social gamblers were more likely to choose socially-related gambling. An examination of remaining motives suggests additional categories may be warranted -- specifically financial and charitable reasons. These findings offer some support for the model; however, it may need to be expanded to account for other motives. The study highlights the advantages and limitations of using self-generated reasons to study gambling motivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel S. McGrath & Sherry H. Stewart & Raymond M. Klein & Sean P. Barrett, 2010. "Self-generated motives for gambling in two population-based samples of gamblers," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 117-138, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:117-138
    DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2010.499915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2010.499915
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14459795.2010.499915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin J. I. Schellenberg & Daniel S. McGrath & Kristianne Dechant, 2016. "The Gambling Motives Questionnaire financial: factor structure, measurement invariance, and relationships with gambling behaviour," International Gambling Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intgms:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:117-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIGS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.