IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intecj/v34y2020i4p599-612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Decision-Making Behavior of Judge in the Criminal Trial: The Effect of Sentencing Guideline in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Seong-Kyoon Kim
  • Bong-Joon Yoon
  • Jeungil Oh

Abstract

We study how the adoption of sentencing guidelines affects punishment for crimes. Using 6350 first-trial rulings for criminal cases in South Korea for the period before the adoption of sentencing guidelines (2003–2011) and the period after (2011–2016), we estimate the ordered probit model, classifying punishment into four categories of severity. According to our estimates, punishment for most crimes becomes lighter after the adoption of sentencing guidelines. Among economic crimes, embezzlement and theft receive less severe punishment, while punishment for fraud has strengthened. Of non-economic crimes, perjury and false accusation receive lighter punishment, which would hardly improve the low trust level in South Korean society. Punishment for the obstruction of justice has also weakened, reflecting growing awareness of individual rights among citizens. Judges who prefer severe punishment before the adoption of sentencing guideline maintain their stringent sentences, while those who prefer light punishment lower sentences with confidence due to the sentencing guideline. We call this phenomenon judge’s upward-risk aversion not to exceed the guideline in sentencing.

Suggested Citation

  • Seong-Kyoon Kim & Bong-Joon Yoon & Jeungil Oh, 2020. "A Study on the Decision-Making Behavior of Judge in the Criminal Trial: The Effect of Sentencing Guideline in South Korea," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 599-612, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:34:y:2020:i:4:p:599-612
    DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2020.1818273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10168737.2020.1818273
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10168737.2020.1818273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:34:y:2020:i:4:p:599-612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIEJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.