IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/intecj/v34y2020i2p185-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting the Effects of Services Trade Liberalization

Author

Listed:
  • Parul Deswal

Abstract

This paper uses a computable model of trade to estimate the effects of a free trade agreement on the services and the manufacturing sector. It is parameterized using 2005 data for 6 services industries and total manufacturing sector in 32 countries. The results show that a 10% reduction in both services and total manufacturing trade costs in all the countries will increase welfare by an average 10.20% across all countries. The average welfare gains across all countries are higher in case of reduction in only services trade costs compared to a 10% reduction in only manufacturing trade costs. Interestingly, however there are some countries in which trade liberalization in manufacturing brings more welfare than trade liberalization in services, while in other countries it is vice versa. The simulation results also show that implementing a trade agreement between the U.S. and the U.K. which reduces trade costs in both services and manufacturing by 10% would increase welfare in both the countries: 1.18% in the U.K. and 0.98% in the U.S. In the U.S. specialization increases in travel services, other services and manufacturing. In the U.K. specialization increases in financial services, construction services and manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Parul Deswal, 2020. "Predicting the Effects of Services Trade Liberalization," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 185-201, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:34:y:2020:i:2:p:185-201
    DOI: 10.1080/10168737.2019.1704822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10168737.2019.1704822
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10168737.2019.1704822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:intecj:v:34:y:2020:i:2:p:185-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RIEJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.