IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v31y2024i1p105-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building synthetic worlds: lessons from the excessive infatuation and oversold disillusionment with the metaverse

Author

Listed:
  • Michael G. Jacobides
  • Francois Candelon
  • Lisa Krayer
  • Katie Round
  • Winson Chen

Abstract

The metaverse comprises a range of technologies offering shared digital experiences based on immersive virtual worlds or decentralised economies. Brands, Big Tech, and investors made huge investments in the metaverse, but users did not share their excitement and the bubble duly burst. We explore this story by drawing on a wide range of data sources and first-hand knowledge. We consider the metaverse as a set of overlapping, partly competing ecosystems and expand the lens of industry architecture to Ecosystem Architecture to examine the rules, roles, and responsibilities involved. We find that incumbent firms rushed to embrace the metaverse in the hope of pre-empting disruption and safeguarding their competitive position, leading to over-investment. Greed among ecosystem orchestrators impeded contributors from creating value, while persistent technological shortcomings impaired the user experience. Our study throws new light on the dynamics of innovation and technology hypes and the challenges involved in cultivating and coordinating ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael G. Jacobides & Francois Candelon & Lisa Krayer & Katie Round & Winson Chen, 2024. "Building synthetic worlds: lessons from the excessive infatuation and oversold disillusionment with the metaverse," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 105-129, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:105-129
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2023.2279051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2023.2279051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2023.2279051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:31:y:2024:i:1:p:105-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.