Foreign Direct Investment
AbstractWhether foreign direct investment will lead to deindustrialisation at home depends on the investing country's capability to restructure itself on the intra-firm, intra-industry, and intersectoral levels. This paper divides FDI into defensive and expansionary types and argues that defensive FDI is an indication of deteriorating comparative advantage at home. The industry in which defensive FDI prevails lacks the capacity for restructuring. Data from Taiwan show that domestic production declines in an industry when defensive FDI dominates expansionary FDI in that industry.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Industry and Innovation.
Volume (Year): 2 (1995)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Patrick Hamm & Lawrence King, 2010. "Post-Manichean Economics: Foreign Investment, State Capacity and Economic Development in Transition Economies," Working Papers wp227, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
- Gunseli Berik, 2000. "Mature Export-Led Growth and Gender Wage Inequality in Taiwan," Feminist Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 1-26.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.