IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v29y2022i10p1231-1262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The search for alternatives to internal combustion: instantiation mechanisms of institutional logics among scientists and engineers

Author

Listed:
  • Byungchae Jin
  • David A. Kirsch

Abstract

While much of the institutional research has suggested and empirically demonstrated that institutional logics shape cognitive and behavioural patterns of actors, what still remains unclear is how scientists and engineers instantiate the conceptual elements of institutional logics in the context of the emergence of new technologies. We demonstrate the mechanisms through which scientists and engineers use the conceptual elements of multiple institutional logics in response to changes in external socio-economic and political conditions to justify their own research activities. Our context is the forty-year search for alternatives to internal combustion within a leading international conference on electric and hybrid electric vehicles (EVS). Combining Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA) and inductive methods, we identify four distinct instantiation mechanisms – contextualising, spanning, appropriating, and conflating – that scientists and engineers searching for a successful alternative to internal combustion used to instantiate the institutional logics within which they were embedded.

Suggested Citation

  • Byungchae Jin & David A. Kirsch, 2022. "The search for alternatives to internal combustion: instantiation mechanisms of institutional logics among scientists and engineers," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(10), pages 1231-1262, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:29:y:2022:i:10:p:1231-1262
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2022.2114318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2022.2114318
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2022.2114318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:29:y:2022:i:10:p:1231-1262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.