IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/houspd/v29y2019i4p627-644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Foreclosure Prevention Counseling Work?

Author

Listed:
  • Jerry Anthony
  • Thomas P. Verghese

Abstract

The United States experienced its worst housing market collapse since the Great Depression during 2006–2010. This collapse triggered the Great Recession. During the housing market collapse and the Great Recession, about 5.5 million homeowners in the United States lost their homes to foreclosure. In this article, we present findings about the effectiveness of foreclosure prevention counseling. Although many recent studies have examined this issue, almost all have major methodological shortcomings that render their findings less useful for policymakers than they could have been. Using data from a national sample and employing a before–after research design with pre- and postcounseling data for several months, our study avoids the pitfalls of other recent works. We find that counseling is effective in preventing foreclosure for about 39% of homeowners counseled. We identify a few factors that correlate with a positive postcounseling outcome. The findings of this study could improve ongoing foreclosure counseling programs, and thereby assist in stabilizing and reviving the U.S. housing market. Our findings could also improve the design of future foreclosure counseling programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerry Anthony & Thomas P. Verghese, 2019. "Does Foreclosure Prevention Counseling Work?," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 627-644, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:29:y:2019:i:4:p:627-644
    DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2019.1568278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2019.1568278
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10511482.2019.1568278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:houspd:v:29:y:2019:i:4:p:627-644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RHPD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.