IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/hbhfxx/v24y2023i2p171-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Firm-Initiated Tweets on Stock Return and Trading Volume

Author

Listed:
  • Aditya Ganesh
  • Subramanian Iyer

Abstract

Recent SEC guidelines enabled many Fortune 500 companies to actively adopt social media, such as Twitter, to disseminate information. In this paper, we analyze the relationship between tweets by corporations and stock returns. Our study used over 1.2 million corporate tweets made by thirty companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average between April 2013 and July 2020. The shocks from the frequency of corporate tweets can positively impact stock returns and trading volume. We, therefore, examine causality and impulse response between frequency of corporate tweets, stock returns, and changes in trading volume using a vector autoregression model. Our findings indicate that 43 percent of stocks exhibit Granger causality between firm-initiated tweets and changes in trading volume. We find evidence consistent with the attention-induced price pressure hypothesis proposed by Barber and Odean. We observe that a shock in corporate tweeting behavior translates into a positive effect on changes in trading volume and returns in 73 percent and 60 percent of stocks, respectively. These results are significant for developing appropriate social media communication strategies. The findings are also valuable for investors and traders who can deploy forecasting models utilizing corporate tweets to earn superior returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Aditya Ganesh & Subramanian Iyer, 2023. "Impact of Firm-Initiated Tweets on Stock Return and Trading Volume," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 171-182, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:24:y:2023:i:2:p:171-182
    DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2021.1949717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2021.1949717
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15427560.2021.1949717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:24:y:2023:i:2:p:171-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/hbhf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.