IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gnstxx/v35y2023i1p56-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Binary disease prediction using tail quantiles of the distribution of continuous biomarkers

Author

Listed:
  • Michiel H. J. Paus
  • Edwin R. van den Heuvel
  • Marc J. M. Meddens

Abstract

In the analysis of binary disease classification, numerous techniques exist, but they merely work well for mean differences in biomarkers between cases and controls. Biological processes are, however, much more heterogeneous, and differences could also occur in other distributional characteristics (e.g. variances, skewness). Many machine learning techniques are better capable of utilizing these higher-order distributional differences, sometimes at cost of explainability. In this study, we propose quantile based prediction (QBP), a binary classification method based on the selection of multiple continuous biomarkers and using the tail differences between biomarker distributions of cases and controls. The performance of QBP is compared to supervised learning methods using extensive simulation studies, and two case studies: major depression disorder (MDD) and trisomy. QBP outperformed alternative methods when biomarkers predominantly show variance differences between cases and controls, especially in the MDD case study. More research is needed to further optimise QBP.

Suggested Citation

  • Michiel H. J. Paus & Edwin R. van den Heuvel & Marc J. M. Meddens, 2023. "Binary disease prediction using tail quantiles of the distribution of continuous biomarkers," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 56-87, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:56-87
    DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2022.2141738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10485252.2022.2141738
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10485252.2022.2141738?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:56-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GNST20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.