IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gnstxx/v32y2020i1p246-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tuning parameter selection for penalised empirical likelihood with a diverging number of parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Chaowen Zheng
  • Yichao Wu

Abstract

Penalised likelihood methods have been a success in analysing high dimensional data. Tang and Leng [(2010), ‘Penalized High-Dimensional Empirical Likelihood’, Biometrika, 97(4), 905–920] extended the penalisation approach to the empirical likelihood scenario and showed that the penalised empirical likelihood estimator could identify the true predictors consistently in the linear regression models. However, this desired selection consistency property of the penalised empirical likelihood method relies heavily on the choice of the tuning parameter. In this work, we propose a tuning parameter selection procedure for penalised empirical likelihood to guarantee that this selection consistency can be achieved. Specifically, we propose a generalised information criterion (GIC) for the penalised empirical likelihood in the linear regression case. We show that the tuning parameter selected by the GIC yields the true model consistently even when the number of predictors diverges to infinity with the sample size. We demonstrate the performance of our procedure by numerical simulations and a real data analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaowen Zheng & Yichao Wu, 2020. "Tuning parameter selection for penalised empirical likelihood with a diverging number of parameters," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 246-261, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:246-261
    DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2020.1717491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10485252.2020.1717491
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10485252.2020.1717491?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:246-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GNST20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.