IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gnstxx/v29y2017i2p189-212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weighted composite quantile regression analysis for nonignorable missing data using nonresponse instrument

Author

Listed:
  • Puying Zhao
  • Hui Zhao
  • Niansheng Tang
  • Zhaohai Li

Abstract

Efficient statistical inference on nonignorable missing data is a challenging problem. This paper proposes a new estimation procedure based on composite quantile regression (CQR) for linear regression models with nonignorable missing data, that is applicable even with high-dimensional covariates. A parametric model is assumed for modelling response probability, which is estimated by the empirical likelihood approach. Local identifiability of the proposed strategy is guaranteed on the basis of an instrumental variable approach. A set of data-based adaptive weights constructed via an empirical likelihood method is used to weight CQR functions. The proposed method is resistant to heavy-tailed errors or outliers in the response. An adaptive penalisation method for variable selection is proposed to achieve sparsity with high-dimensional covariates. Limiting distributions of the proposed estimators are derived. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the finite sample performance of the proposed methodologies. An application to the ACTG 175 data is analysed.

Suggested Citation

  • Puying Zhao & Hui Zhao & Niansheng Tang & Zhaohai Li, 2017. "Weighted composite quantile regression analysis for nonignorable missing data using nonresponse instrument," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 189-212, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:29:y:2017:i:2:p:189-212
    DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2017.1285030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10485252.2017.1285030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10485252.2017.1285030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ted Chang & Phillip S. Kott, 2008. "Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse under a plausible model," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(3), pages 555-571.
    2. Rothenberg, Thomas J, 1971. "Identification in Parametric Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(3), pages 577-591, May.
    3. Koenker,Roger, 2005. "Quantile Regression," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521845731.
    4. Jiang, Depeng & Zhao, Puying & Tang, Niansheng, 2016. "A propensity score adjustment method for regression models with nonignorable missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 98-119.
    5. Linjun Tang & Zhangong Zhou, 2015. "Weighted local linear CQR for varying-coefficient models with missing covariates," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(3), pages 583-604, September.
    6. Qin J. & Leung D. & Shao J., 2002. "Estimation With Survey Data Under Nonignorable Nonresponse or Informative Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 193-200, March.
    7. Kim, Jae Kwang & Yu, Cindy Long, 2011. "A Semiparametric Estimation of Mean Functionals With Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 157-165.
    8. Fan J. & Li R., 2001. "Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 96, pages 1348-1360, December.
    9. Kott, Phillip S. & Chang, Ted, 2008. "Can Calibration Be Used to Adjust for “Nonignorable” Nonresponse?," NASS Research Reports 234387, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.
    10. J. G. Ibrahim & S. R. Lipsitz & M.‐H. Chen, 1999. "Missing covariates in generalized linear models when the missing data mechanism is non‐ignorable," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 173-190.
    11. Gong Tang, 2003. "Analysis of multivariate missing data with nonignorable nonresponse," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(4), pages 747-764, December.
    12. Jiwei Zhao & Jun Shao, 2015. "Semiparametric Pseudo-Likelihoods in Generalized Linear Models With Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1577-1590, December.
    13. Cheng Yong Tang & Chenlei Leng, 2011. "Empirical likelihood and quantile regression in longitudinal data analysis," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(4), pages 1001-1006.
    14. repec:ags:unassr:234387 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xianwen Ding & Jiandong Chen & Xueping Chen, 2020. "Regularized quantile regression for ultrahigh-dimensional data with nonignorable missing responses," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(5), pages 545-568, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xianwen Ding & Jiandong Chen & Xueping Chen, 2020. "Regularized quantile regression for ultrahigh-dimensional data with nonignorable missing responses," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 83(5), pages 545-568, July.
    2. Zhang, Jing & Wang, Qihua & Kang, Jian, 2020. "Feature screening under missing indicator imputation with non-ignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Li, Mengyan & Ma, Yanyuan & Zhao, Jiwei, 2022. "Efficient estimation in a partially specified nonignorable propensity score model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Shonosuke Sugasawa & Kosuke Morikawa & Keisuke Takahata, 2022. "Bayesian semiparametric modeling of response mechanism for nonignorable missing data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(1), pages 101-117, March.
    5. Zhang, Ting & Wang, Lei, 2020. "Smoothed empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for quantile regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    6. Jiang, Depeng & Zhao, Puying & Tang, Niansheng, 2016. "A propensity score adjustment method for regression models with nonignorable missing covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 98-119.
    7. Jiwei Zhao & Jun Shao, 2015. "Semiparametric Pseudo-Likelihoods in Generalized Linear Models With Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(512), pages 1577-1590, December.
    8. Cui, Xia & Guo, Jianhua & Yang, Guangren, 2017. "On the identifiability and estimation of generalized linear models with parametric nonignorable missing data mechanism," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 64-80.
    9. Wang, Lei & Zhao, Puying & Shao, Jun, 2021. "Dimension-reduced semiparametric estimation of distribution functions and quantiles with nonignorable nonresponse," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Liu, Tianqing & Yuan, Xiaohui & Sun, Jianguo, 2021. "Weighted rank estimation for nonparametric transformation models with nonignorable missing data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Pengfei Li & Jing Qin & Yukun Liu, 2023. "Instability of inverse probability weighting methods and a remedy for nonignorable missing data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3215-3226, December.
    12. Ji Chen & Jun Shao & Fang Fang, 2021. "Instrument search in pseudo-likelihood approach for nonignorable nonresponse," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(3), pages 519-533, June.
    13. Jiwei Zhao, 2017. "Reducing bias for maximum approximate conditional likelihood estimator with general missing data mechanism," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 577-593, July.
    14. Yujing Shao & Lei Wang, 2022. "Generalized partial linear models with nonignorable dropouts," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 223-252, February.
    15. Xiaojun Mao & Zhonglei Wang & Shu Yang, 2023. "Matrix completion under complex survey sampling," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 75(3), pages 463-492, June.
    16. Lei Wang & Wei Ma, 2021. "Improved empirical likelihood inference and variable selection for generalized linear models with longitudinal nonignorable dropouts," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(3), pages 623-647, June.
    17. Zhong Guan & Jing Qin, 2017. "Empirical likelihood method for non-ignorable missing data problems," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 113-135, January.
    18. Bindele, Huybrechts F. & Nguelifack, Brice M., 2019. "Generalized signed-rank estimation for regression models with non-ignorable missing responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 14-33.
    19. Tianqing Liu & Xiaohui Yuan, 2020. "Doubly robust augmented-estimating-equations estimation with nonignorable nonresponse data," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 2241-2270, December.
    20. Xuerong Chen & Guoqing Diao & Jing Qin, 2020. "Pseudo likelihood‐based estimation and testing of missingness mechanism function in nonignorable missing data problems," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1377-1400, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:29:y:2017:i:2:p:189-212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GNST20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.