IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gmasxx/v45y2021i3p148-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing through ambiguity: a flocking model of the inter-dynamics between pricing practices and market uncertainties

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolu Wang

Abstract

Pricing practices of firms are an important yet the least studied aspect of the price phenomenon in sociology. This paper answers the question: why do firms, even in the same market, tend to use different pricing practices – value-informed, competition-informed, or cost-informed pricing – to set prices? To that end, this study constructs a formal dynamic flocking model to investigate the inter-dynamics between market uncertainties and the viability of the three pricing practices. The model is a substantial revision and extension of Harrison White’s static W(y) market model by reformulating the latter into a dynamic one and by explicitly incorporating different market uncertainties into the model as variables. The study shows that each kind of pricing practice is only viable under certain distributions of market uncertainties. The theory is then used to explain the distribution of pricing practices among firms in the Burgundy wine market. Theoretical and methodological innovations and the implications for firms and for sociological research on markets and uncertainties are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolu Wang, 2021. "Pricing through ambiguity: a flocking model of the inter-dynamics between pricing practices and market uncertainties," The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 148-182, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gmasxx:v:45:y:2021:i:3:p:148-182
    DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2020.1746297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0022250X.2020.1746297
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0022250X.2020.1746297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gmasxx:v:45:y:2021:i:3:p:148-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gmas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.