IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ginixx/v42y2016i3p503-529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consensus Decisions and Similarity Measures in International Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Frank Häge
  • Simon Hug

Abstract

Voting behavior in international organizations, most notably in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), is often used to infer the similarity of foreign policy preferences of member states. Most of these measures ignore, however, that particular covoting patterns may appear simply by chance (Häge 2011) and that these patterns of agreement (or the absence thereof) are only observable if decisions are reached through roll-call votes. As the relative frequency of roll-call votes changes considerably over time in most international organizations, currently used similarity and affinity measures offer a misleading picture. Based on a complete data set of UNGA resolution decisions, we demonstrate how taking different forms of chance agreement and the relative prevalence of consensus decisions into account affects conclusions about the effect of the similarity of member states’ foreign policy positions on foreign aid allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank Häge & Simon Hug, 2016. "Consensus Decisions and Similarity Measures in International Organizations," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 503-529, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:42:y:2016:i:3:p:503-529
    DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2016.1138107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03050629.2016.1138107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03050629.2016.1138107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joshua Fjelstul & Simon Hug & Christopher Kilby, 2022. "Decision-Making in the United Nations General Assembly: A Comprehensive Database of Resolutions, Decisions, and Votes," Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series 56, Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics.
    2. Oliver Pamp & Florian Dendorfer & Paul W. Thurner, 2018. "Arm your friends and save on defense? The impact of arms exports on military expenditures," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 165-187, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ginixx:v:42:y:2016:i:3:p:503-529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GINI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.