IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v26y2023i6p744-753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes of adjacent segment biomechanics after anterior cervical interbody fusion with different profile design plate: single- versus double-level

Author

Listed:
  • Lin-Yu Jin
  • Ke Wei
  • Da-Ming Feng
  • Jian-Dong Li
  • Xiao-Xing Song
  • Hong-Ling Yin
  • Xin-Feng Li

Abstract

Low-profile angle-stable spacer Zero-P is claimed to reduce the morbidity associated with traditional plate and cage construct (PCC). Both Zero-P and PCC could achieve comparable mid- and long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). It is not clear whether Zero-P can reduce the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), especially in multi-segmental fusion. This study aimed to test the effect of fusion level with Zero-P versus with PCC on adjacent-segment biomechanics in ACDF. A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of an intact C2–T1 segment was built and validated. Six single- or double-level instrumented conditions were modeled from this intact FE model using Zero-P or the standard PCC. The biomechanical responses of adjacent segments at the cephalad and caudal levels of the operation level were assessed in terms of range of motion (ROM), stresses in the endplate and disc, loads in the facets. When comparing the increase of adjacent-segment motion in single-level PCC fusion versus Zero-P fusion, a significantly larger increase was found in double-level fusion condition. The fold changes of PCC versus Zero-P of intradiscal and endplate stress, and facet load at adjacent levels in the double-level fusion spine were significantly larger than that in the single-level fusion spine during the sagittal, the transverse, and the frontal plane motion. The increased value of biomechanical features was greater at above segment than that at below. The fold changes of PCC versus Zero-P at adjacent segment were most notable in flexion and extension movement. Low-profile device could decrease adjacent segment biomechanical burden compared to traditional PCC in ACDF, especially in double-level surgery. Zero-P could be a good alternative for traditional PCC in ACDF. Further clinical/in vivo studies will be necessary to explore the approaches selected for this study is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin-Yu Jin & Ke Wei & Da-Ming Feng & Jian-Dong Li & Xiao-Xing Song & Hong-Ling Yin & Xin-Feng Li, 2023. "Changes of adjacent segment biomechanics after anterior cervical interbody fusion with different profile design plate: single- versus double-level," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 744-753, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:6:p:744-753
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2086800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2022.2086800
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2022.2086800?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:6:p:744-753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.