IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v26y2023i13p1595-1609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carotid hemodynamic response to external pressure and comparison with induced-stenosis progression: a fluid-structure interaction study

Author

Listed:
  • Kshitij Shakya
  • Dalchand Ahirwar
  • P. M. Nabeel
  • Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury

Abstract

Non-invasive stenosis detection has always been difficult. A new concept of applying external pressure over the artery was compared with stenosis growth in this computational study. When stenosis develops, the artery constricts, obstructing blood flow in that area. Under external pressure, the constricted artery behaves similarly. The current fluid-structure interaction study compares the hemodynamic parameters of a stenosed artery and an artery subjected to external pressure. Significant similarities were discovered when the velocity profile and arterial displacement for both scenarios were compared. This study can be used to characterise stenosis experimentally while remaining non-invasive.

Suggested Citation

  • Kshitij Shakya & Dalchand Ahirwar & P. M. Nabeel & Shubhajit Roy Chowdhury, 2023. "Carotid hemodynamic response to external pressure and comparison with induced-stenosis progression: a fluid-structure interaction study," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(13), pages 1595-1609, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:13:p:1595-1609
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2128785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2022.2128785
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2022.2128785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:13:p:1595-1609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.