IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v26y2023i11p1330-1340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of intervertebral ligament properties utilized in a thoracic spine functional unit through kinematic evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Polanco
  • Stacie Ringleb
  • Michel Audette
  • Rumit Kakar
  • Sebastian Bawab

Abstract

Ligament properties in the literature are variable, yet scarce, but needed to calibrate computational models for spine clinical research applications. A comparison of ligament stiffness properties and their effect on the kinematic behavior of a thoracic functional spinal unit (FSU) is examined in this paper. Six unique ligament property sets were utilized within a volumetric T7–T8 finite element (FE) model developed using computer-aided design (CAD) spinal geometry. A 7.5 Nm moment was applied along three anatomical planes both with and without costovertebral (CV) joints present. Range of Motion (RoM) was assessed for each property set and compared to published experimental data. Intact and serial ligament removal procedures were implemented in accordance with experimental protocol. The variance in both kinematic behavior and comparability with experimental data among property sets emphasizes the role nonlinear characterization plays in determining proper kinematic behavior in spinal FE models. Additionally, a decrease in RoM variation among property sets was exhibited when the model setup incorporated the CV joint. With proper assessment of the source and size of each ligament, the material properties considered here could be expanded and justified for implementation into thoracic spine clinical studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Polanco & Stacie Ringleb & Michel Audette & Rumit Kakar & Sebastian Bawab, 2023. "A comparison of intervertebral ligament properties utilized in a thoracic spine functional unit through kinematic evaluation," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(11), pages 1330-1340, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:11:p:1330-1340
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2115293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2022.2115293
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2022.2115293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:26:y:2023:i:11:p:1330-1340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.