IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v24y2021i9p933-944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of the mechanism of toxicity as applied to human cell line ECV304

Author

Listed:
  • Yasser Abd Djawad
  • Janice Kiely
  • Richard Luxton

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify the pattern of cytotoxicity testing of the human cell line ECV304 using three techniques of an ensemble learning algorithm (bagging, boosting and stacking). The study of cell morphology of ECV304 cell line was conducted using impedimetric measurement. Three types of toxins were applied to the ECV304 cell line namely 1 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), 5% dimethyl sulfoxide and 10 μg Saponin. The measurement was conducted using electrodes and lock-in amplifier to detect impedance changes during cytotoxicity testing within a frequency range 200 and 830 kHz. The results were analysed, processed and extracted using detrended fluctuation analysis to obtain characteristics and features of the cells when exposed to the each of the toxins. Three ensemble algorithms applied showed slightly different results on the performance for classifying the data set from the feature extraction that was performed. However, the results show that the cell reaction to the toxins could be classified.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasser Abd Djawad & Janice Kiely & Richard Luxton, 2021. "Classification of the mechanism of toxicity as applied to human cell line ECV304," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9), pages 933-944, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:9:p:933-944
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1861255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2020.1861255
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2020.1861255?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:24:y:2021:i:9:p:933-944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.