IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v23y2020i13p1026-1033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accurate reconstructions of pelvic defects and discontinuities using statistical shape models

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Meynen
  • Harold Matthews
  • Nele Nauwelaers
  • Peter Claes
  • Michiel Mulier
  • Lennart Scheys

Abstract

Treatment of large acetabular defects and discontinuities remains challenging and relies on the accurate restoration of the native anatomy of the patient. This study introduces and validates a statistical shape model for the reconstruction of acetabular discontinuities with severe bone loss through a two-sided Markov Chain Monte Carlo reconstruction method. The performance of the reconstruction algorithm was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation in three defect types with varying severity as well as severe defects with discontinuities. The two-sided reconstruction method was compared to a one-sided methodology. Although, reconstruction errors increased with defect size and this increase was most pronounced for pelvic discontinuities, the two-sided reconstruction method was able to reconstruct the native anatomy with higher accuracy than the one-sided reconstruction method. These findings can improve the preoperative planning and custom implant design in patients with large pelvic defects, both with and without discontinuities.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Meynen & Harold Matthews & Nele Nauwelaers & Peter Claes & Michiel Mulier & Lennart Scheys, 2020. "Accurate reconstructions of pelvic defects and discontinuities using statistical shape models," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(13), pages 1026-1033, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:23:y:2020:i:13:p:1026-1033
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1784404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2020.1784404
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2020.1784404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:23:y:2020:i:13:p:1026-1033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.