IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v20y2017i14p1502-1511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of inertial sensor sampling frequency on the accuracy of measurement parameters in rearfoot running

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Mitschke
  • Falk Zaumseil
  • Thomas L. Milani

Abstract

Increasingly, inertial sensors are being used for running analyses. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the influence of inertial sensor sampling frequencies (SF) on the accuracy of kinematic, spatio-temporal, and kinetic parameters. We hypothesized that running analyses at lower SF result in less signal information and therefore the inability to sufficiently interpret measurement data. Twenty-one subjects participated in this study. Rearfoot strikers ran on an indoor running track at a velocity of 3.5 ± 0.1 ms−1. A uniaxial accelerometer was attached at the tibia and an inertial measurement unit was mounted at the heel of the right shoe. All sensors were synchronized at the start and data was measured with 1000 Hz (reference SF). Datasets were reduced to 500, 333, 250, 200, and 100 Hz in post-processing. The results of this study showed that a minimum SF of 500 Hz should be used to accurately measure kinetic parameters (e.g. peak heel acceleration). In contrast, stride length showed accurate results even at 333 Hz. 200 Hz were required to calculate parameters accurately for peak tibial acceleration, stride duration, and all kinematic measurements. The information from this study is necessary to correctly interpret measurement data of existing investigations and to plan future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Mitschke & Falk Zaumseil & Thomas L. Milani, 2017. "The influence of inertial sensor sampling frequency on the accuracy of measurement parameters in rearfoot running," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(14), pages 1502-1511, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:14:p:1502-1511
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1382482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2017.1382482
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2017.1382482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel E. Lieberman & Madhusudhan Venkadesan & William A. Werbel & Adam I. Daoud & Susan D’Andrea & Irene S. Davis & Robert Ojiambo Mang’Eni & Yannis Pitsiladis, 2010. "Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners," Nature, Nature, vol. 463(7280), pages 531-535, January.
    2. U. Rajendra Acharya & S. Vinitha Sree & Choo Min Lim & Peng Chuan Alvin Ang & Masaki Sekine & Toshiyo Tamura, 2013. "Comparison of walking parameters obtained from the young, elderly and adults with support," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(11), pages 1202-1212, November.
    3. C. Scheffer & T. Cloete, 2012. "Inertial motion capture in conjunction with an artificial neural network can differentiate the gait patterns of hemiparetic stroke patients compared with able-bodied counterparts," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 285-294.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Rubio-Peirotén & Felipe García-Pinillos & Diego Jaén-Carrillo & Antonio Cartón-Llorente & Ferrán Abat & Luis E. Roche-Seruendo, 2021. "Relationship between Connective Tissue Morphology and Lower-Limb Stiffness in Endurance Runners. A Prospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Chao-Fu Chen & Hui-Ju Wu & Chao Liu & Soun-Cheng Wang, 2022. "Kinematics Analysis of Male Runners via Forefoot and Rearfoot Strike Strategies: A Preliminary Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-10, November.
    3. Felipe García-Pinillos & Diego Jaén-Carrillo & Pedro Ángel Latorre-Román & Carles Escalona-Marfil & Víctor M. Soto-Hermoso & Carlos Lago-Fuentes & Silvia Pueyo-Villa & Irma Domínguez-Azpíroz & Luis E., 2021. "Does Arch Stiffness Influence Running Spatiotemporal Parameters? An Analysis of the Relationship between Influencing Factors on Running Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-9, March.
    4. Andrigo Zaar & Eduardo Borba Neves & Abel Ilah Rouboa & Victor Machado Reis, 2017. "Determinative Factors in The Injury Incidence on Runners: Synthesis of Evidence “Injuries on Runners”," The Open Sports Sciences Journal, Bentham Open, vol. 10(1), pages 294-304, December.
    5. Ying-Jen Lai & Willy Chou & I-Hua Chu & Yu-Lin Wang & Yi-Jing Lin & Shihfan Jack Tu & Lan-Yuen Guo, 2020. "Will the Foot Strike Pattern Change at Different Running Speeds with or without Wearing Shoes?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Ana Marchena-Rodriguez & Ana Belen Ortega-Avila & Pablo Cervera-Garvi & David Cabello-Manrique & Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron, 2020. "Review of Terms and Definitions Used in Descriptions of Running Shoes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-11, May.
    7. Ana Paula da Silva Azevedo & Bruno Mezêncio & Alberto Carlos Amadio & Julio Cerca Serrão, 2016. "16 Weeks of Progressive Barefoot Running Training Changes Impact Force and Muscle Activation in Habitual Shod Runners," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Koji Nishida & Shota Hagio & Benio Kibushi & Toshio Moritani & Motoki Kouzaki, 2017. "Comparison of muscle synergies for running between different foot strike patterns," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Niki M Stolwijk & Jacques Duysens & Jan Willem K Louwerens & Yvonne HM van de Ven & Noël LW Keijsers, 2013. "Flat Feet, Happy Feet? Comparison of the Dynamic Plantar Pressure Distribution and Static Medial Foot Geometry between Malawian and Dutch Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Patrick Devlieger & Jori De Coster, 2017. "On Footwear and Disability: A Dance of Animacy?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, June.
    11. Yang Yang & Xini Zhang & Zhen Luo & Xi Wang & Dongqiang Ye & Weijie Fu, 2020. "Alterations in Running Biomechanics after 12 Week Gait Retraining with Minimalist Shoes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Xinyan Jiang & Huiyu Zhou & Wenjing Quan & Qiuli Hu & Julien S. Baker & Yaodong Gu, 2021. "Ground Reaction Force Differences between Bionic Shoes and Neutral Running Shoes in Recreational Male Runners before and after a 5 km Run," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-12, September.
    13. Elena Escamilla-Martínez & Beatriz Gómez-Martín & Lourdes María Fernández-Seguín & Alfonso Martínez-Nova & Juan Diego Pedrera-Zamorano & Raquel Sánchez-Rodríguez, 2020. "Longitudinal Analysis of Plantar Pressures with Wear of a Running Shoe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-8, March.
    14. Enrico Santoro & Antonio Tessitore & Chiang Liu & Chi-Hsien Chen & Chutimon Khemtong & Mauro Mandorino & Yi-Hua Lee & Giancarlo Condello, 2021. "The Biomechanical Characterization of the Turning Phase during a 180° Change of Direction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:20:y:2017:i:14:p:1502-1511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.