IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gcmbxx/v19y2016i7p800-806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are clinical parameters sufficient to model gait patterns in patients with cerebral palsy using a multilinear approach?

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure
  • Yoshisama Sagawa
  • Vincent Pomero
  • Pierre Lascombes
  • Geraldo De Coulon
  • Stéphane Armand

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinical parameters are sufficient using, a multilinear regression model, to reproduce the sagittal plane joint angles (hip, knee, and ankle) in cerebral palsy gait. A total of 154 patients were included. The two legs were considered (308 observations). Thirty-six clinical parameters were used as regressors (range of motion, muscle strength, and spasticity of the lower). From the clinical gait analysis, the joint angles of the sagittal plane were selected. Results showed that clinical parameter does not provide sufficient information to recover joint angles and/or that the multilinear regression model is not an appropriate solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Bonnefoy-Mazure & Yoshisama Sagawa & Vincent Pomero & Pierre Lascombes & Geraldo De Coulon & Stéphane Armand, 2016. "Are clinical parameters sufficient to model gait patterns in patients with cerebral palsy using a multilinear approach?," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 800-806, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:19:y:2016:i:7:p:800-806
    DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1064112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10255842.2015.1064112
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10255842.2015.1064112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gcmbxx:v:19:y:2016:i:7:p:800-806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/gcmb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.