IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/flgsxx/v50y2024i2p451-474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is a powerful but corrupt public manager more trustworthy? Lessons from the case of rural local government in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Md Shahriar Islam
  • Abu Hossain Muhammad Ahsan
  • Rifat Mahmud

Abstract

A survey experiment was conducted at the Union Council level in Bangladesh to gauge if citizens emphasise the power of the public manager (popularly known as Chairman of the Union Council) more than their corrupt practices. The analysis gauges that perspective based on citizens’ perception of public managers’ trustworthiness at the local level. The chronic absence of empirical research on local government public managers in a country from the Global South prompted us to focus on Bangladesh to carry out this research. The analysis of the two independent sample populations in the survey experiment suggests that local citizens have normative trust in less powerful but honest public managers. Our findings highlight that citizens in rural local government in Bangladesh have a certain degree of normative political awareness, which allows them to evaluate the public manager’s trustworthiness, not merely based on the power distance or patriarchal culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Shahriar Islam & Abu Hossain Muhammad Ahsan & Rifat Mahmud, 2024. "Is a powerful but corrupt public manager more trustworthy? Lessons from the case of rural local government in Bangladesh," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 451-474, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:50:y:2024:i:2:p:451-474
    DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2023.2212241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2023.2212241
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03003930.2023.2212241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:50:y:2024:i:2:p:451-474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/flgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.