IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/flgsxx/v50y2024i1p109-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local government officers, pragmatism and creativity during austerity – the case of Urban Green Newcastle

Author

Listed:
  • Siobhan Daly
  • Rachael Chapman
  • Andreja Pegan

Abstract

In the UK, during austerity local governments face pressures to identify transformative financial solutions to parks provision and to protect parks as public spaces. Yet, how local government officers balance these demands is under-explored. This article discusses the transfer of Newcastle upon Tyne’s parks from local government to a new entity, Urban Green Newcastle. Working within a project framework, across the local authority, and in public consultation, we show how local government officers crafted narratives to legitimise their work and to provide an ex-post rationalisation for: creative working; the changes to democratic accountability in the new model; and the risks involved in creating UGN. The article deepens our understanding of local government officers’ agency during austerity via its attention to legitimisation narratives. We show how local government officers contribute to the (re)conception of parks as public spaces through the negotiation of alternative narratives of parks management, governance, and democratic accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Siobhan Daly & Rachael Chapman & Andreja Pegan, 2024. "Local government officers, pragmatism and creativity during austerity – the case of Urban Green Newcastle," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(1), pages 109-127, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:50:y:2024:i:1:p:109-127
    DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2023.2179995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2023.2179995
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03003930.2023.2179995?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:50:y:2024:i:1:p:109-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/flgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.