IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/flgsxx/v47y2021i1p145-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A gender-generation gap in political representation? The contingent impact of preference voting in Norwegian municipal elections

Author

Listed:
  • Signe Bock Segaard
  • Jo Saglie

Abstract

The article analyses the impact of preference votes on the gender balance in municipal councils in Norway, and to what extent this impact varies with candidates’ age, party and local context. We compare actual representation with a hypothetical closed-list outcome. The analyses show that both local political representation and the impact of preference votes are characterised by a gender-generation gap. Older women are underrepresented, while young women are represented on equal terms with young men. Young female candidates benefit from preference voting in larger municipalities, whereas the older generation of women loses out in both large and small municipalities. In conclusion, we argue that an intersectionality approach should pay more attention to variables other than ethnicity, including age and local context. Moreover, research on gender and political representation should take into account a gender-generation perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Signe Bock Segaard & Jo Saglie, 2021. "A gender-generation gap in political representation? The contingent impact of preference voting in Norwegian municipal elections," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 145-165, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:47:y:2021:i:1:p:145-165
    DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1797691
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2020.1797691
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03003930.2020.1797691?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:47:y:2021:i:1:p:145-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/flgs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.