IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fglcxx/v22y2021i2p143-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Street corner decisions: an empirical investigation of extortionist choices in El Salvador

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Ponce

Abstract

This paper identifies offender choice patterns associated with extortion subtypes in El Salvador, Central America. Previous research attributes the rise of extortion in the country to the evolution and propagation of Los Angeles-born street gangs Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) and Barrio 18. Data from a unique business victimisation survey is used to analyse 53 decisions in 869 reported cases. The study borrows a multidimensional scaling method used in criminal profiling research to identify offender choice patterns. Cases are classified into extortion subtypes based on identified choice groupings. Key offender choices and location features are compared across extortion subtypes. Offender choice patterns identified in the study are consistent with systemic and opportunistic extortion described in previous literature. About a third of the cases are designated as hybrid extortions due to the blend of choice structuring properties they exhibit, which combines aspects of both systemic and opportunistic extortion.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Ponce, 2021. "Street corner decisions: an empirical investigation of extortionist choices in El Salvador," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 143-165, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:fglcxx:v:22:y:2021:i:2:p:143-165
    DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2021.1875212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17440572.2021.1875212
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17440572.2021.1875212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fglcxx:v:22:y:2021:i:2:p:143-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FGLC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.