IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fglcxx/v22y2021i1p22-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cumulative disruptions: interdependency and commitment escalation as mechanisms of illicit network failure

Author

Listed:
  • Michelle D. Fabiani
  • Brandon Behlendorf

Abstract

Disruptions can take many forms resulting from both internal and external tensions. How illicit networks fail to adapt to a wide range of disruptions is an important but understudied area of network analysis. Moreover, disruptions can be cumulative, constraining the possible set of subsequent adaptations for a network given previous investments. Drawing from a multi-national/multi-year investigation of a prominent Chinese human smuggling network operated by Cheng Chui Ping (‘Sister Ping’), we find that the network’s failure was a product of two interrelated factors. First, efforts to scale the network to meet increased demand made the network more interdependent, adding new members and increasing vulnerabilities to internal disruptions. Second, internal and external disruptions during a shipment cumulatively constrained the network’s ability to adapt, forcing the network to escalate their commitment rather than abandon the transit. The results suggest network disruptions should be examined holistically to improve our understanding of network failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Michelle D. Fabiani & Brandon Behlendorf, 2021. "Cumulative disruptions: interdependency and commitment escalation as mechanisms of illicit network failure," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 22-50, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fglcxx:v:22:y:2021:i:1:p:22-50
    DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2020.1806825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17440572.2020.1806825
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17440572.2020.1806825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fglcxx:v:22:y:2021:i:1:p:22-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FGLC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.