IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/fglcxx/v17y2016i2p152-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The harms of human trafficking: demonstrating the applicability and value of a new framework for systematic, empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria A. Greenfield
  • Letizia Paoli
  • Andries Zoutendijk

Abstract

This article uses human trafficking in Belgium to test a newly developed framework for assessing the harms of crime that has been applied previously to cocaine trafficking in the same country. We chose this criminal activity because of its policy relevance and to address apparent needs for systematic, evidence-based analysis. The framework uses quantitative and qualitative evidence to assess harms to individuals, private-sector entities, and others and to establish crime control priorities. The assessment process models the activity, evaluates the severity and incidence of harms, ranks priorities, and considers causality. We highlight three findings. First, trafficking victims can experience catastrophic harms, but the overall dimensions of human trafficking in Belgium appear to be modest. Second, the evidence suggests significant recent declines in the degree of exploitation and use of violence. Third, most harms to individual victims result directly from the activity, which sets it apart from other forms of trafficking.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria A. Greenfield & Letizia Paoli & Andries Zoutendijk, 2016. "The harms of human trafficking: demonstrating the applicability and value of a new framework for systematic, empirical analysis," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 152-180, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:fglcxx:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:152-180
    DOI: 10.1080/17440572.2016.1161037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17440572.2016.1161037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17440572.2016.1161037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:fglcxx:v:17:y:2016:i:2:p:152-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FGLC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.