IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v28y2022i1p56-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Gendered Analysis of Individual-Level Asset Poverty in Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Boaz Anglade
  • Pilar Useche
  • Carmen Diana Deere

Abstract

This study uses individual-level wealth data to explore the gender dimensions of asset poverty among the principal adults in Ecuadorean households, the first such study in a developing country. The study departs from conventional practice by analyzing not only sole heads but also partnered men and women heads and show systematic differences by gender, marital status, and household type. Among both sole and partnered heads, women are more likely to be asset poor than men. Further, in contrast to developed countries, asset poverty rates are much higher among partnered men and women than among sole men and women heads, largely because of structural factors that put those in consensual unions at a disadvantage in accumulating assets. The gender gap, however, is much larger among sole heads. In Ecuador, the risk of asset poverty is mainly associated with low levels of education, type of employment, and not having received an inheritance.HIGHLIGHTS This study uses individual-level asset data to explore the extent of asset poverty in Ecuador.Women in Ecuador are more likely to be asset poor compared to men.The gender asset gap is more prominent among sole heads of household.Asset poverty rates are the highest among women in consensual unions.Education, employment, and inheritance significantly explain asset poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • Boaz Anglade & Pilar Useche & Carmen Diana Deere, 2022. "A Gendered Analysis of Individual-Level Asset Poverty in Ecuador," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 56-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:56-85
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2021.1995019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2021.1995019
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2021.1995019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:56-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.