IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/femeco/v26y2020i2p187-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiled: the Effect of the Headscarf Ban on Women’s Tertiary Education in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Zeynep B. Uğur

Abstract

The majority of women in Turkey wear headscarves. However, from 1997 to 2013, headscarves were banned in tertiary education institutions, due to the Turkish military’s decision that headscarves are incompatible with secularism. This study examines the impact of wearing headscarves on women’s educational attainment. In particular, it measures the impact of the headscarf ban by using a regression–discontinuity method, based on individual-level data from four countrywide surveys. Within the confines of the econometric analysis and data set used, the author finds statistically significantly lower tertiary educational attainment among headscarved women, but finds no evidence that the ban reduced the tertiary educational attainment of headscarved women. This result may reflect that, since only 3.5 percent of headscarved women born before the ban had some tertiary education, there was not much room for the methodological approach to capture any significant effects of the ban.HIGHLIGHTS - There exists a large gap in the educational attainment of headscarved women compared to that of non-headscarved women in Turkey, even after controlling for background variables.- This paper finds no evidence that the ban on headscarves at tertiary educational institutions, in effect from 1997 to 2013, reduced the tertiary educational attainment of headscarved women, which was already low.- Educational disadvantage for headscarved women begins after primary school.- Although lifting the headscarf ban was a good first step, eliminating the barriers to women’s education will require a much broader perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeynep B. Uğur, 2020. "Unveiled: the Effect of the Headscarf Ban on Women’s Tertiary Education in Turkey," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 187-217, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:26:y:2020:i:2:p:187-217
    DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2019.1685119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2019.1685119
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13545701.2019.1685119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:femeco:v:26:y:2020:i:2:p:187-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RFEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.