IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v31y2023i12p2425-2445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polycentricity and accessibility in mountain areas: the Alpine case

Author

Listed:
  • Dominik Bertram
  • Tobias Chilla

Abstract

The concept of centrality focuses on fair accessibility to services of general interest. This is a considerable challenge in mountain regions due to low population density and morphological context. However, the centrality debate has hardly taken morphology into account, even though mountain areas require a specific form of spatial organization – a lower level of accessibility leads either to longer distances and travel times or (in the better case) to increased service supply in smaller settlements. In this paper, we examine small Alpine towns’ polycentricity at a micro scale and respond to the key question: What role does accessibility play in the centrality of small towns in the Alps? Our study builds on a comprehensive accessibility mapping of 780 towns in the Alps with more than 3,000 inhabitants. The study shows that the size of a settlement and its role in the settlement system are linked in a less linear way than polycentricity models postulate. Many small towns have to provide key functions for large catchment areas. We quantify this dimension by measuring population catchment intensities. Our approach combines demographic and accessibility analyses and is potentially applicable to other areas with geographical specificities that are relevant objects of cohesion policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominik Bertram & Tobias Chilla, 2023. "Polycentricity and accessibility in mountain areas: the Alpine case," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(12), pages 2425-2445, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:31:y:2023:i:12:p:2425-2445
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2145874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2022.2145874
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2022.2145874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:31:y:2023:i:12:p:2425-2445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.