IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v29y2021i5p827-843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cohesion Policy and the citizens’ perceptions of the EU: the role of communication and implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Dąbrowski
  • Marjolein Spaans
  • Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado
  • Roberto Rocco

Abstract

EU Cohesion Policy has arguably the most tangible impact on the citizens’ environment and livelihoods and can potentially boost their attachment to the European project. Beyond the cross-national transactionalist hypothesis, Cohesion Policy spending has a local impact and may affect the lives of citizens who do not benefit directly from cross-national transactions, like education, work, investment and travel in other European countries. One could thus expect that Cohesion Policy has a significant positive impact on the ways in which citizens perceive the EU. But what happens when a country is a net contributor to the EU’s budget receiving a relatively small amount of Cohesion Policy funding, the bulk of it being invested in poorer European territories? Building on the cases of two Dutch regions – Flevoland and Limburg – this paper investigates the extent to which the citizens are aware of Cohesion Policy interventions and how the features of communication on and implementation of Cohesion Policy affect this awareness.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Dąbrowski & Marjolein Spaans & Ana Maria Fernandez-Maldonado & Roberto Rocco, 2021. "Cohesion Policy and the citizens’ perceptions of the EU: the role of communication and implementation," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 827-843, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:29:y:2021:i:5:p:827-843
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1805413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2020.1805413
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2020.1805413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:29:y:2021:i:5:p:827-843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.