IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v28y2020i11p2213-2236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning culture – dynamics of power relations between actors

Author

Listed:
  • Almut Wolff

Abstract

Existing literature on planning culture is often connected to communicative turn in planning and implies a multilateral interaction process. This article discusses the role of the underlying power constellations within processes of decision-making in planning and their significance for any planning culture. Power relations between actors involved in planning processes are asymmetric. The actors’ influence on planning outcomes depends highly on the strategic use these actors make of their power resources. The processes will be shaped by both the actors’ divergent cultures and the common culture they create in interacting with each other. Actors’ cultures do not only frame their expectations on goals and appropriate decision-making processes but also the strategies they apply. In this paper, I argue that these expectations and strategies impact decision-making processes because they intrude into institutionalized and legally defined planning procedures. How open a planning process is to input from various actors depends on power configurations, which in turn affect how actors perceive each other’s legitimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Almut Wolff, 2020. "Planning culture – dynamics of power relations between actors," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(11), pages 2213-2236, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:28:y:2020:i:11:p:2213-2236
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1714553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2020.1714553
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2020.1714553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:28:y:2020:i:11:p:2213-2236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.