IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v25y2017i1p67-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptation, adaptability and resilience: the recovery of Kobe after the Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Oliva
  • Luciana Lazzeretti

Abstract

In the past few years, the concept of resilience has captured the attention of academics, politicians and public opinion and has been identified as the source of recovery policies of local, regional and national economies. As a result, searching for the so-called resilient factor has led governments to manage territories and resources, combining sustainability and adaptation in an increasingly risky world. The purpose of this paper is to investigate resilience in response to natural disasters through the analysis of the recovery process of the city of Kobe destroyed by the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in 1995. Japanese regions have always coexisted with significant external pressures often leading to environmental disasters and consequent relevant economic and social damage. Kobe has been an emblematic case because of its rapidity in urban reconstruction and speeding of economic recovery. Kobe and the Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995 represent a successful case of resilient city able to adapt to changing circumstances and to foster local development proposing a renewed image of a creative city.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Oliva & Luciana Lazzeretti, 2017. "Adaptation, adaptability and resilience: the recovery of Kobe after the Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 67-87, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:67-87
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1260093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2016.1260093
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2016.1260093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawley, Stuart & Pike, Andy & Tomaney, John, 2010. "Towards the resilient region?: policy activism and peripheral region development," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 33523, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Stuart Dawley & Andy Pike & John Tomaney, 2010. "Towards the Resilient Region?: Policy Activism and Peripheral Region Development," SERC Discussion Papers 0053, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laure Rousset & César Ducruet, 2020. "Disruptions in Spatial Networks: a Comparative Study of Major Shocks Affecting Ports and Shipping Patterns," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 423-447, June.
    2. Blesilda P. Badoc-Gonzales & Ma. Belinda S. Mandigma & Jackson J. Tan, 2022. "SME resilience as a catalyst for tourism destinations: a literature review," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 23-44, December.
    3. Ockert Rudolf Pretorius & Johannes Ernst Drewes & Trynos Gumbo, 2022. "Evidence to Inform Resilience Policy in the SADC: Current Limitations and Future Research Areas," World, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-21, July.
    4. Melanie M. Bakema & Constanza Parra & Philip McCann, 2018. "Analyzing the Social Lead-Up to a Human-Induced Disaster: The Gas Extraction-Earthquake Nexus in Groningen, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Freshwater, David, 2014. "Vulnerability and Resilience: Two Dimensions of Rurality," Staff Papers 174103, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    2. Ayda Eraydin, 2016. "The role of regional policies along with the external and endogenous factors in the resilience of regions," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(1), pages 217-234.
    3. Yannis Psycharis & Anastasia Panori & Dimitrios Athanasopoulos, 2022. "Public Investment and Regional Resilience: Empirical Evidence from the Greek Regions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(1), pages 57-79, February.
    4. Alexandru Pavel & Bogdan Andrei Moldovan & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2020. "Urban or Rural: Does It Make A Difference for Economic Resilience? A Modelling Study on Economic and Cultural Geography in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-39, May.
    5. Gillian Bristow & Adrian Healy, 2014. "Regional Resilience: An Agency Perspective," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 923-935, May.
    6. Haichao Yu & Yan Liu & Chengliang Liu & Fei Fan, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Inequality in China’s Economic Resilience across Cities and Urban Agglomerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Oto HUDEC & Nataliia MANAKOVA & Monika SISEROVA, 2017. "Which Cities Are Vulnerable To The Global Economic Crisis? Evidence Related To Slovak Cities," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(2), pages 30-47, April.
    8. Mingke Xie & Zhangxian Feng & Chenggu Li, 2022. "How Does Population Shrinkage Affect Economic Resilience? A Case Study of Resource-Based Cities in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:25:y:2017:i:1:p:67-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.