IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v21y2013i8p1276-1296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Change in Land Planning: Two Cases from Galicia

Author

Listed:
  • José María Tubío-Sánchez
  • Francisco Ónega-López
  • Wim Timmermans
  • Rafael Crecente-Maseda

Abstract

Why do societies implement land policies? A number of arguments have been put forward in the literature, ranging from economic conceptions based on market failure and the problem of negative externalities to a more social conception based on welfare distribution and collaborative planning. However, neither all societies with similar market failures or negative externalities develop and implement land planning nor implemented land planning always results from collaborative planning. The arguments found in the literature seem not to fit the reality and, in most cases, cannot explain why societies create or undertake innovations in land planning. Within the framework of institutional change theory and based on the analysis of the emergence of two land planning devices-a land use law and a land banking law-in Galicia, Northwest Spain, this paper argues that land planning is developed to tackle negative outcomes of former institutional setups. However, the negativity of such outcomes is measured not in terms of economic performance, but in terms of social acceptance. The search for a workable definition of property within the Galician society seems to be the main driver of institutional change in land use planning analysed in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • José María Tubío-Sánchez & Francisco Ónega-López & Wim Timmermans & Rafael Crecente-Maseda, 2013. "Institutional Change in Land Planning: Two Cases from Galicia," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 1276-1296, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:21:y:2013:i:8:p:1276-1296
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.722947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2012.722947
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2012.722947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:21:y:2013:i:8:p:1276-1296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.