IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v10y2002i6p793-798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning Under a Scottish Parliament: A Missed Opportunity?

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Allmendinger

Abstract

Devolution has naturally led to expectations of legislative and policy divergence. Given its largely unitary nature across the UK such anticipation has also been a characteristic of planning debates. In Wales and Northern Ireland there is evidence of some progress in developing planning to better meet the needs of those areas. In Scotland, however, there have been far more modest achievements to date. Far from charting a new course for planning through legislative and policy change the trajectory for planning in Scotland post-devolution has been very similar to that south of the border. This article explores the changes to planning under the Scottish Parliament and discusses some of the reasons for the apparent lack of ambition and progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Allmendinger, 2002. "Planning Under a Scottish Parliament: A Missed Opportunity?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 793-798, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:10:y:2002:i:6:p:793-798
    DOI: 10.1080/0965431022000003825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0965431022000003825
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0965431022000003825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Tewdwr-Jones & Janice Morphet & Philip Allmendinger, 2006. "The Contested Strategies of Local Governance: Community Strategies, Development Plans, and Local Government Modernisation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(3), pages 533-551, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:10:y:2002:i:6:p:793-798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.