IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v27y2021i15p1459-1488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting zombie banks

Author

Listed:
  • Franco Fiordelisi
  • Nemanja Radić
  • Thomas Weyman-Jones

Abstract

Capital adequacy has become the main regulatory tool to achieve financial stability in the last twenty years. While most papers analysed the effect of capital adequacy on risk taking, there is a lack of evidence on the relationship between deleveraging and the return on equity capital. In this paper, we examine the evolution of the banking system in Japan over the period 2000–16, where the re-capitalization issue has already played a major role in policy making. Specifically, we estimate the shadow return on equity capital for both listed and unlisted banks by measuring the loans-funding-equity technology through the dual cost function, controlling for risk exposure and bad loans, and accounting for both the standard asset-based model of bank outputs, and income-based model. Such an approach is likely to be important if the central bank permits banks with unsustainable balance sheets to continue in existence, and we refer to this as zombie banking. Overall, our results show that deleveraging did reduce the shadow return on equity for the City banks. We also find that that the presence of ‘zombie’ banks was concentrated and large among the smaller less diversified Regional Banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Franco Fiordelisi & Nemanja Radić & Thomas Weyman-Jones, 2021. "Detecting zombie banks," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(15), pages 1459-1488, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:27:y:2021:i:15:p:1459-1488
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2021.1893200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1893200
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1893200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:27:y:2021:i:15:p:1459-1488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.