IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjdr/v20y2008i1p1-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy, economic federalism, and product market entry: the Indian experience

Author

Listed:
  • S. K. Bhaumik
  • S. Gangopadhyay
  • S. Krishnan

Abstract

Productivity growth has long been associated with, among other things, contestability of markets which, in turn, is dependent on the ease with which potential competitors to the incumbent firms can enter the product market. There is a growing consensus that in emerging markets regulatory and institutional factors may have a greater influence on a firm's ability to enter a product market than strategic positions adopted by the incumbent firms. We examine this proposition in the context of India where the industrial policies of the 1980s and the 1990s are widely believed to be pro-incumbent and pro-competition, respectively, thereby providing the setting for a natural experiment with 1991 as the watershed year. In our analysis, we also take into consideration the possibility that the greater economic federalism associated with the reforms of the 1990s may have affected the distribution of industrial units across states after 1991. Our paper, which uses the experiences of the textiles and electrical machinery sectors during the two decades as the basis for the analysis, finds broad support for both these hypotheses. La croissance de la productivité a longtemps été associée, entre autres, avec la contestabilité des marchés, qui à son tour dépend de la facilité avec laquelle des concurrents potentiels pour les entreprises en place peuvent entrer sur le marché. Il existe un consensus croissant sur le fait que, sur les marchés émergents, les facteurs institutionnels et régulateurs peuvent avoir un meilleur impact sur la capacité des entreprises à pénétrer un marché que des stratégies adoptées à cet effet par les entreprises en place. Cette hypothèse est examinée dans le cas de l'Inde, où il est communément admis que les politiques industrielles des années 1980 avaient été favorables aux entreprises en place alors que celles des années 1990 se montrèrent plus ouvertes à la concurrence; cela fournit ainsi le cadre d'une expérience naturelle où 1991 est considéré comme l'année charnière. Notre analyse considère également que le fédéralisme économique plus important associé aux réformes des années 1990 pourrait avoir affecté la répartition géographique des activités industrielles entre les différents Etats. Notre article, en s'appuyant sur les cas des secteurs du textile et des équipements électriques au cours des deux décennies, fournit des arguments en faveur de ces deux hypothèses.

Suggested Citation

  • S. K. Bhaumik & S. Gangopadhyay & S. Krishnan, 2008. "Policy, economic federalism, and product market entry: the Indian experience," The European Journal of Development Research, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjdr:v:20:y:2008:i:1:p:1-30
    DOI: 10.1080/09578810701853124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/09578810701853124&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09578810701853124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:wdi:papers:2011-1029 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Bhaumik, Sumon K. & Dimova, Ralitza, 2012. "Does Human Capital Endowment of FDI Recipient Countries Really Matter? Evidence from Cross-Country Firm Level Data," IZA Discussion Papers 6382, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Ralitza Dimova, 2013. "Special Issue. Guest Editor: Zhihao Yu," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 559-570, August.
    4. Sumon Bhaumik & Ralitza Dimova & Subal C. Kumbhakar & Kai Sun, 2012. "Does Institutional Quality Affect Firm Performance? Insights from a Semi-Parametric Approach," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series wp1029, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    5. Aradhna Aggarwal & Takahiro Sato, 2011. "Firm Dynamics and Productivity Growth in Indian Manufacturing: Evidence from Plant Level Panel Dataset," Discussion Paper Series DP2011-07, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    6. Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Shubhashis Gangopadhyay & Shagun Krishnan, 2009. "Reforms and Entry: Some Evidence from the Indian Manufacturing Sector," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 658-672, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjdr:v:20:y:2008:i:1:p:1-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FEDR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.