IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v33y2024i1p77-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experimental Study of Endogenous Discretionary Controls on Employee Effort

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy D. Douthit
  • Jing Liu
  • Steven T. Schwartz
  • Richard A. Young

Abstract

Discretionary controls are controls that can be applied at the ex post discretion of the superior rather than being supported by pre-committed enforceable contracts. This study examines employees’ effort levels when a discretionary control is endogenously present (chosen by the superior) relative to when it is exogenously present (assigned by the experimenters). Results from our gift-exchange experiment regarding superiors’ choice of a discretionary control run counter to prior research on superiors’ choice to use pre-committed controls in two important ways. First, we find employee effort is unaffected by the superior’s choice of a discretionary control relative to when it is exogenous. That is, the intentional choice of a discretionary control does not seem to be resented by the employee. Second, we find employee effort is lower when superiors choose not to have a discretionary control present relative to when it is exogenously unavailable. That is, we not only find no reward to forgoing a discretionary control, but rather a cost to not choosing a discretionary control. In sum, our results support the prevalence of discretionary controls in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy D. Douthit & Jing Liu & Steven T. Schwartz & Richard A. Young, 2024. "An Experimental Study of Endogenous Discretionary Controls on Employee Effort," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 77-103, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:77-103
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2022.2063151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2022.2063151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2022.2063151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:77-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.