IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v33y2024i1p171-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Client Acquisition Impair the Objectivity of Engagement Partners and Engagement Quality Review Partners?

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Chan
  • Rong-Ruey Duh
  • Hun-Tong Tan

Abstract

We conduct two experiments using experienced audit partners as participants to investigate whether engagement partners’ involvement in the client acquisition process as the contact partner can influence their subsequent audit judgments, and whether the engagement quality review partner’s judgments are influenced when he or she is aware that engagement partners play both roles. As predicted, we find that engagement partners who are also the contact partners during client acquisition tend to make judgments that are biased in favor of the client. However, engagement quality review partners are not sensitive to whether the engagement partner was the contact partner or not, but may be motivated to make decisions that favor the engagement partner. Our results provide a deeper understanding of how the client acquisition process influences the judgments of various partners later in the course of audit engagements.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Chan & Rong-Ruey Duh & Hun-Tong Tan, 2024. "Does Client Acquisition Impair the Objectivity of Engagement Partners and Engagement Quality Review Partners?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 171-190, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:171-190
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2022.2074493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2022.2074493
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2022.2074493?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:171-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.