IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v33y2024i1p105-132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do Managers use Management Control Systems in Response to Shareholder Activism?

Author

Listed:
  • Marcielle Anzilago
  • Jacobo Gomez-Conde
  • Rogerio J. Lunkes

Abstract

We study how managers interactively use management control systems (MCS) in response to shareholder activism in a context of performance declines. We predict that broad-scope MCS design is a key factor that helps explain variation in the level of interactive use. In addition, we argue that the extent to which diagnostic use of MCS alleviates shareholder pressures depends on analysts’ recommendations. We empirically test our hypotheses with survey and archival data. Data on shareholder activism is hand-collected. The results provide support for our predictions, suggesting that managers use MCS interactively to assuage shareholder activism in the context of performance declines. This effect is less pronounced for managers equipped with broad-scope information from their MCS. Our findings indicate that in a setting of favorable analysts’ recommendations, managers use MCS diagnostically instead of interactively to cope with shareholder activism. Overall, the findings may help inform our understanding of how firms manage shareholder activism from a management control perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcielle Anzilago & Jacobo Gomez-Conde & Rogerio J. Lunkes, 2024. "How do Managers use Management Control Systems in Response to Shareholder Activism?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 105-132, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:105-132
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2022.2063152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2022.2063152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2022.2063152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:105-132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.