IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v32y2023i4p841-873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Quality: An Analysis of Audit Partner Cultural Proximity to Client Executives

Author

Listed:
  • Anh Viet Pham
  • Mia Hang Pham
  • Cameron Truong

Abstract

We find that cultural proximity between auditors and CFOs is associated with audit quality. We use recent mandated PCAOB disclosures of engagement audit partners to construct cultural proximity between engagement audit partners and client executives. Building on an extensive literature on homophily in social connections, we hypothesize that when an engagement audit partner is culturally close to client executives, the accounting negotiation is more efficient, resulting in higher audit quality. Consistent with this prediction, we find that audited earnings are of higher quality when the engagement audit partner is culturally close to the CFO. We, however, do not find similar evidence when the engagement audit partner is culturally close to the CEO. Our findings are consistent across several alternative measures of audit quality and cultural proximity. These findings suggest that interpersonal factors from the auditor–client relationship are important for audit outcomes. Our study supports the PCAOB’s position that mandatory disclosures of engagement audit partner identity are helpful in understanding audit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Anh Viet Pham & Mia Hang Pham & Cameron Truong, 2023. "Audit Quality: An Analysis of Audit Partner Cultural Proximity to Client Executives," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 841-873, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:32:y:2023:i:4:p:841-873
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2022.2026238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2022.2026238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2022.2026238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:32:y:2023:i:4:p:841-873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.