IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v32y2023i3p745-778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Institutions and Cost Stickiness: International Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Nan-Ting Kuo
  • Cheng-Few Lee

Abstract

This study explores the association between political institutions and cost stickiness. Prior literature suggests that cost stickiness is driven by the economic implication that pursues firm profits and the agency implication that pursues managers’ benefits. We argue that political institutions affect cost stickiness by constraining government expropriation, which in turn affects the relative importance between these two implications on managerial resource decisions. Using an international sample, we find that strong political institutions are associated with higher cost stickiness. Furthermore, cost stickiness is more likely driven by the economic implication when political institutions are strong and by the agency implication when political institutions are weak, implying that cost stickiness is more likely value-enhancing when political institutions are strong. Mediation analysis reveals that political institutions affect cost stickiness through contract enforcement and corruption control. Our study contributes to the cost behavior literature and the literature about how political institutions affect corporate investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nan-Ting Kuo & Cheng-Few Lee, 2023. "Political Institutions and Cost Stickiness: International Evidence," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 745-778, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:32:y:2023:i:3:p:745-778
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2021.2000459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2021.2000459
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2021.2000459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:32:y:2023:i:3:p:745-778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.