IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v31y2022i5p1059-1088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Practitioner Research Help Auditors to Provide Higher Audit Quality and Improve their Reputation?

Author

Listed:
  • Benedikt Downar
  • Jürgen Ernstberger
  • Christopher Koch
  • Martin Prott

Abstract

This paper investigates why auditors engage in practitioner research and whether these auditors subsequently provide higher audit quality and increase their reputation. Based on the theory of domain learning as well as insights from interviews, we argue that engaging in practitioner research could help auditors to acquire expertise relevant for performing the audit. Further, we draw on signaling theory and argue that this engagement might also contribute to the development of auditors’ reputation. We use the German setting for our study, where many auditors write professional articles, books, and book chapters. We observe that various motivational and support factors are important determinants for writing publications. We find that having prior publications is associated with higher audit quality, i.e. lower absolute discretionary accruals and a lower likelihood of restatements. Finally, we provide indications that having prior publications helps auditors to develop their reputation, i.e. achieving growth in their client portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Benedikt Downar & Jürgen Ernstberger & Christopher Koch & Martin Prott, 2022. "Does Practitioner Research Help Auditors to Provide Higher Audit Quality and Improve their Reputation?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 1059-1088, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:1059-1088
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2022.2103013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2022.2103013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2022.2103013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:31:y:2022:i:5:p:1059-1088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.